Those feet!
Why this dismal view of Jerusalem?
Richard Morrison: Commentary
The Times
April 12, 2008
O clouds unfold! The great Jerusalem controversy is rattling the pews of the Church of England again.
Perhaps it is decreed in some ancient scroll that, every five or six years, an Anglican clergyman will make a complete hassock of himself by banning the singing of England’s most inspiring hymn, William Blake’s Jerusalem, from a service in an English church. This time there is an added ecclesiastical frisson. The latest cleric to issue a red card to “And did those feet in ancient times” is one of the Church’s most senior priests.
Last week the Very Rev Colin Slee, the Dean of Southwark, banned Jerusalem from a private memorial service in Southwark Cathedral. He has subsequently taken himself off to Brazil (presumably not in a chariot of fire) and is unavailable for comment. But a spokesman for the Diocese of Southwark confirmed that the dean “does not believe that Jerusalem is to the glory of God”. And this is apparently not the first time that he has forbidden its lusty rendition — to Hubert Parry’s Heaven-storming tune — within his small but perfectly formed South London cathedral.
It’s all here …
Blackballing Blake
The argument in the Anglican church over Blake's Jerusalem is about theology, not political correctness
Tim Footman
The Guardian
April 11, 2008
The news that the hymn Jerusalem has been banned from Southwark Cathedral has inevitably been denounced by conservative churchmen as evidence of the politically correct namby-pambyism of the Anglican establishment. But this rather misses the point. In the past, some clergymen have objected to its supposed nationalist overtones, perhaps thinking of its popularity with the braying yahoos at the Last Night of the Proms. But the objection of the Dean of Southwark, Colin Slee, is more nuanced: he argues that Jerusalem is "not in the glory of God"; essentially that, in Anglican terms at least, it isn't really a hymn.
And, you know what? He's right. Blake never wrote it as a hymn; it's the preface to his long, obscure poem Milton, and it was only when Hubert Parry set it to music in 1916, as an attempt to rally a war-weary public, that it began to be interpreted in the jingoistic terms beloved of the Daily Telegraph.
It’s all here …

Recent Comments